Endeavor More — Funnel Flow Every channel, from first view to a scheduled sales meeting — and what’s genuinely different

What stands out

The flow

Hover a stream to spotlight a channel. Circles on a stream mark where it is genuinely different from the rest.

▲much stronger than the others▼much weaker·worth watching

Post checkup

What’s holding a post back? Compared only with your other posts on the same channel: how many views it should get, where it leaks, and what fixing that would be worth.

All the numbers

Same data as the flow, as a grid. Color appears only where a channel is genuinely different (strong = solid, watch = light); everything else stays plain.

How “outlier” is decided

A gap only counts if it is big enough to matter and too big to be luck. For each step (“of everyone at A, how many reached B?”) a channel is compared with all the other channels combined, and a post with the other posts on its own channel.

Outlier — the rate is at least 20% higher or lower than the rest and a gap that size would happen by luck less than about 1 time in 370.
Worth watching — same size gap, but only about 1 time in 22 by luck. Keep an eye on it.
Not enough people — with fewer than 100 people in either group (or too few clicks to compare) nothing is flagged, however big the gap looks.
Different people (unique ÷ views) is shown but never judged: it describes how repeat-heavy an audience is, not how well a step worked.

Many comparisons are made at once, so a lone “worth watching” can still be luck; outliers are held to the stricter bar for that reason. A statistical outlier tells you where to look, not why.